Which process should you automate first?
Five questions to find the project that will pay off fastest.
1 / 5 — How often does the process that annoys you come round?
2 / 5 — Do its rules change often?
3 / 5 — Who would own the flow once it runs?
4 / 5 — Do you know what this process costs you today?
5 / 5 — Does the process handle personal data?
Table of Contents
- What Power Automate Actually Does
- The Approvals Sleeping in Someone’s Inbox
- Filing the Documents that Arrive from Everywhere
- The Reminders Nobody Wants to Send
- Retyping Data from One Tool into Another
- Employee Onboarding and Offboarding
- The Recurring Report You Rebuild by Hand
- Sorting Incoming Messages and Their Attachments
- Where to Start without Getting Burned
- What You Should Never Automate
- Conclusion
- FAQ

In most companies, business process automation gets tackled backwards. A tool is bought first, then someone goes looking for something to feed it. The result is three flows hacked together in an afternoon, never documented, breaking the first time a folder gets renamed. Yet the shift is real. According to the Axa labour market study, run by the Sotomo institute across 300 Swiss SMEs, more than a third of companies now use these technologies to optimise their processes, up from less than a quarter a year earlier. And 57 % of the companies using them report saving time. So the hard part is not technical. It is choosing the right processes, in the right order. Here are the seven that come up most often, and where to begin.
What Power Automate Actually Does
Before listing processes, a quick framing helps. Power Automate does not do just anything in any way. The tool runs on flows, meaning sequences of actions triggered by a specific event. The Microsoft documentation splits cloud flows into three families, and knowing the difference changes how you pick your projects.
| Flow type | What triggers it | Typical business case |
|---|---|---|
| Automated flow | An event | A message arrives, a file is dropped, a row is added |
| Instant flow | A click | Someone launches an approval request straight from Teams |
| Scheduled flow | A date or a time | A report sent every Monday morning, a daily upload |
In other words, any process that starts with a sentence like “when this happens, we do that” is a natural candidate. Conversely, a process that calls for judgement at every step does not lend itself to the exercise. Keep that filter in mind for what follows.
1. The Approvals Sleeping in Someone’s Inbox

Holiday requests, expense claims, purchase orders, quote sign-offs: these approval chains run through every company. Yet they almost always rest on the same fragile support, one manager’s inbox. A request lands there, slides under a dozen other messages, and the requester chases it three days later.
An approval flow changes the nature of the problem. The request goes into a dedicated space, the approver gets a notification in Teams, answers in one click, and the requester is informed automatically. Moreover, every decision leaves a timestamped trail. That detail matters a great deal during an audit.
This is usually the first project to launch, for one simple reason: the payoff shows up in the first week, and everyone in the company feels it.
2. Filing the Documents that Arrive from Everywhere
Incoming documents rarely travel a single road. Some arrive by email, others get dropped in Teams, others still come through a form. Then somebody renames and files them, when they remember to.
A flow can take over and apply one constant rule: grab the attachment, rename it to a convention, drop it in the right SharePoint folder and notify the relevant team. Besides, automatic filing kills the question that poisons every search six months later, namely who filed what and where.
- Supplier invoices filed into a monthly accounting folder;
- signed contracts sorted by client, with a renewal date added to a tracking list;
- expense receipts attached to whoever submitted them;
- applications received, sorted by role and by date.
3. The Reminders Nobody Wants to Send

Chasing a client over an unpaid invoice, reminding a colleague that a deadline is closing in, flagging a contract about to expire: these tasks are unpleasant, so they systematically come after everything else. They are expensive all the same, both in cash flow and in service quality.
Automation handles this without hesitation. The flow watches a date in a list, then sends a reminder at the right moment, in the right tone. That way, chasing stops depending on one person’s mental load. In practice, many companies start with contract renewal dates, because forgetting those costs the most.

4. Retyping Data from One Tool into Another
Here is the great classic. Information typed into a form gets copied into a spreadsheet, then picked up in a management tool, before landing in a report. With every copy the error risk grows, and nobody knows which version is authoritative any more.
Power Automate connectors exist for exactly this: moving data between applications without human hands. A form response feeds a SharePoint list directly, which in turn feeds a dashboard. As a result, the data gets entered once.
Watch out for one common trap though. Automating a copy does not fix a badly designed process, it merely speeds up its execution. If your data is entered twice because two teams do not talk to each other, sort out the organisational issue first.
5. Employee Onboarding and Offboarding

A new joiner triggers a long list of actions: create accounts, order hardware, prepare access rights, schedule induction meetings, send documents to sign. That list is perfectly well known, it repeats with every hire, and it still gets redone by hand every time.
An onboarding flow fires the whole sequence from a single event, a new row in a joiners list. Each department receives its task, with a due date. Furthermore, offboarding deserves the same treatment, this time for security reasons: revoking access is the step people forget most often.
6. The Recurring Report You Rebuild by Hand
Every company has one. A sales summary on Monday, a project update on Friday, a monthly dashboard for the board. Whoever produces it opens three files, copies columns, formats the result, then emails it round. The job takes an hour, and it starts again every week.
A scheduled flow does that work at a fixed time. It pulls the data from source, builds the file, then drops it in the right place and notifies the recipients. Consequently, that person gets an hour back every week, close to six working days over a year.
This project carries a bonus. Because the report is always produced the same way, the variations you see week to week finally reflect real activity rather than how the file happened to be assembled.
7. Sorting Incoming Messages and Their Attachments
A generic address such as contact, billing or support takes dozens of messages a day. Someone reads them, qualifies them, then forwards each one to the right person. That sorting work needs no expertise, yet it takes up a real slice of the day.
A flow can read the subject and the sender, apply sorting rules, extract the attachment and create an assigned task. Nevertheless, stay careful on this particular project. Overly aggressive sorting makes important messages disappear, and trust in automation takes a long time to come back. Start with a flow that suggests a classification without deleting or archiving anything.
Where to Start without Getting Burned

The first project usually decides what follows. A useful first flow builds trust, whereas an ambitious broken one buries the topic for a year. Here are the criteria that work:
- High frequency: a daily process pays off more than a quarterly one, even a more complex quarterly one;
- stable rules: if conditions change every month, maintenance will eat the gain;
- a single owner: a flow with no named owner goes orphan the moment that person leaves;
- measurable impact: write down the time spent before, so you can prove the gain after;
- reversibility: favour a first flow you can switch off without blocking the company.
Our article on automating repetitive tasks covers the general logic of the tool. For cases where a flow is not enough and you need a data entry interface, Power Apps takes over.
What You Should Never Automate
An honest article on business process automation has to draw a line too. Some subjects lend themselves badly to the exercise, and tackling them too early does lasting damage.
Avoid decisions that commit a person: refusing leave, an appraisal, a reply to a sensitive complaint. The machine can prepare the file, but the judgement stays human. Next, be wary of processes handling personal data with no defined framework. The Axa study quoted above notes that only one Swiss SME in three has a clear data protection policy, and that figure drops to 23 % among the smallest firms.
Finally, do not touch a process nobody fully understands. If no one in the company can describe the steps end to end, automating it means freezing a mess in place. Document it first, even if you discover it mainly needs simplifying.

Conclusion
Business process automation is not won on technique. It is won on selection. The seven projects presented here share one trait: they are frequent, their rules are stable, and their result can be measured. Start with a single one, the most visible to your teams, then measure the time saved before launching a second. That slow progression beats a grand automation plan that stalls at the third flow. And keep the limit in mind: a tool like Power Automate executes rules, it does not decide for you.
FAQ
Which process should you automate first?
An approval chain, holidays or expenses. The rules are stable, the frequency is high, and the whole company sees the gain immediately.
Do you need to code to use Power Automate?
No. Flows are built visually, from triggers and actions. One day of training is enough to produce your first useful flows.
How much time does a company actually save?
It depends entirely on the process chosen. Measure the time spent before automating one specific case, that is the only way to get a figure that means anything in your organisation.
What happens when a flow breaks?
The flow reports the error and stops. Hence the importance of a named owner for every flow, able to fix or disable it quickly.
Does automation cut jobs?
Rarely. The Axa study quoted above shows that 2 % of Swiss SMEs reduced headcount thanks to productivity gains, while 10 % created new roles.
Can you automate processes touching sensitive data?
Yes, provided you have defined beforehand who accesses what, where the data sits and how long it is kept.
